Your stop button doesn't actually stop anything. A user switches from laptop to phone mid-conversation and the chat starts over. A tool call needs approval, and there's no clean way to get that decision back to the model before it's already moved on. If any of that sounds familiar, you're running into a real limit of SSE (Server-Sent Events), not a bug in your implementation.
SSE is the default transport in the Vercel AI SDK, OpenAI's SDK, and Anthropic's SDK, and it works well right up until your product needs a way for the client to talk back. This page walks through the realistic alternatives: raw WebSockets, long polling, gRPC streaming, and Streamable HTTP, evaluated specifically against what AI chat needs rather than against generic pub/sub criteria.
Key takeaways
SSE is one-way. AI chat features like mid-stream cancellation, tool-call approval, and multi-device delivery all need a channel for the client to send signals back, which SSE cannot provide over the same connection.
None of the usual alternatives, raw WebSockets, long polling, gRPC streaming, or Streamable HTTP, fully overcomes the drawbacks of SSE. Each closes one gap and leaves the rest, a return channel, multi-device delivery, or long-task reliability, for you to build.
The fix is a WebSocket connection managed by a provider that handles reconnection, bidirectional signaling, multi-device fan-out, and protocol fallback. Vercel's native WebSocket beta (since June 2026) covers only a single pinned connection, so most production AI chat still needs a third-party provider for the rest.
Where SSE stops working for AI chat
SSE has no way for the client to send anything back over the same connection. That's fine for a single prompt and a single response. It breaks down the moment your product needs a return path, cancelling a response, approving a tool call, or keeping a session in sync across two devices, since each of those needs the client to send something back mid-stream, not just receive.
The Vercel AI SDK's ChatTransport interface exists because of exactly this gap: it lets teams swap out the default SSE transport for something bidirectional, without touching application code. The ChatTransport implementation guide covers the mechanics in more depth.
Where the popular SSE alternatives fall short
SSE is a protocol for one-way streaming over HTTP, one of several transports for moving messages between client and server. The alternatives aren't all the same kind of thing underneath. WebSockets and Streamable HTTP are protocols, long polling is a plain HTTP technique with no spec of its own, and gRPC is an RPC framework over HTTP/2. What they share is the role they play as the transport connecting client and server.
None of them fully solves AI chat's requirements on its own. Each closes one gap, a return channel, multi-device delivery, or reliable behavior on long tasks, and leaves the rest for you to build. Here's specifically where each one falls short.
Raw WebSockets
A raw WebSocket gets the return channel right: cancel, redirect, and tool-approval signals travel as messages over the same connection as the tokens. But that's as far as it goes. It's just one connection, so reaching a second device means building your own coordination layer. And keeping a long task alive means running a server that can hold the connection open for its full duration, which most serverless functions aren't built for.
Falls short on: multi-device delivery and reconnection, both of which are yours to build.
Long polling
Long polling gets you a return channel without a protocol upgrade, but nearly everything else works against it. Devices don't share state, each runs its own request cycle independently. And because every response closes one request and opens another, a long task means constant request churn instead of one open connection, which drives up latency and server load right when you're streaming tokens fastest.
Falls short on: efficiency at streaming volume, and multi-device delivery.
gRPC streaming
gRPC streaming gives services a bidirectional return channel over HTTP/2, which is why it's the right call between an orchestration layer and a model-serving backend. But it was never built for a browser client: gRPC-Web needs a proxy layer just to reach one. And nothing about it is AI chat-specific, so reconnection and multi-device fan-out are still yours to build.
Falls short on: browser support, and everything beyond raw bidirectionality that AI chat needs.
Streamable HTTP
Streamable HTTP gives an agent a return channel to its tools over a single endpoint. It's the fix the Model Context Protocol (MCP) adopted for the same one-way limitation SSE has, replacing the old dual-endpoint SSE design in a March 2025 spec change. But it solves a different problem entirely: agent-to-tool traffic, not the agent-to-user conversation a chat interface needs to carry.
Falls short on: the user-facing conversation itself, since it operates one layer over from where AI chat actually needs a transport.
Choosing a transport for AI chat in practice
The real alternative to SSE for AI chat in production is a WebSocket connection, but a managed one, not the raw kind. A raw WebSocket still leaves reconnection, fan-out, and fallback for you to build. A managed connection handles all three.
Four things are worth checking before you commit to one:
Offset-based reconnection. A client should catch up on exactly what it missed rather than replaying the whole generation.
Bidirectional signaling. Cancel and steer signals should travel as typed messages, not raw connection closes.
Multi-device fan-out. A session should be able to reach more than one connected device.
Protocol fallback. The transport should degrade automatically to HTTP streaming or long polling on networks that block the WebSocket upgrade.
If you're deploying on Vercel, you might initially consider its native WebSocket support, in public beta since June 2026 with Fluid Compute enabled. But that connection is pinned to a single function instance, capped at 5 minutes by default (30 minutes in extended beta), and it doesn't fan out to other subscribers or survive a restart. For anything beyond a single, session-scoped connection, Vercel's own Knowledge Base still recommends a third-party WebSocket provider connected through the ChatTransport interface. The WebSockets on Vercel guide covers this in more depth.
AWS and Cloudflare have similar constraints. AWS's Application Load Balancer closes idle connections after 60 seconds by default, and Cloudflare's connection limits reference sets a 120-second proxy read timeout, triggering a 524 error if the origin goes quiet that long mid-response. Any transport choice for AI chat needs to survive defaults built for short requests, not minutes-long generations.
How Ably AI Transport fits into the alternatives
Several providers offer a managed WebSocket connection that fits this checklist, listed in Vercel's Knowledge Base. Ably is one, and Ably AI Transport is the WebSocket-backed session layer built to replace a raw connection with a managed one that handles reconnection, signaling, fan-out, and fallback for you. It ticks off all four items from the checklist above:
Offset-based reconnection. Automatic reconnection picks up from the client's last received message, with no catch-up logic to write yourself for a brief disconnect.
Bidirectional signaling. Cancel and steer signals travel as typed messages over the same channel as the response, not a raw connection close the server has to interpret. Redirecting or steering an agent mid-stream is currently rolling out rather than fully available everywhere the cancel signal is.
Multi-device fan-out. A channel publishes to any number of subscribers, so every device on the same conversation sees the same session state, not just the one that opened it.
Protocol fallback. Automatic fallback from WebSocket to HTTP streaming when a network blocks the upgrade, which matters most on corporate networks and older proxies where a raw WebSocket connection may never open in the first place.
That's the shape of a transport that holds up for production AI chat: reconnection, bidirectional signaling, multi-device fan-out, and protocol fallback, handled for you instead of built by hand.
And if you're using Vercel, Ably AI Transport implements the Vercel AI SDK's ChatTransport interface, so swapping it in for the default SSE transport is a change to how messages travel, not to your agent logic or UI code.
Docs go deeper: see the Vercel AI SDK integration guide for the specific integration steps.
And if you're ready to get started, sign up for a free Ably account, no credit card required, or read the Ably AI Transport docs.
What is the best alternative to SSE for realtime AI apps on Vercel?
In most cases, WebSockets connected through a third-party provider via the Vercel AI SDK's ChatTransport interface. Vercel Functions gained native WebSocket support in public beta in June 2026, but that connection is pinned to a single function instance with a duration cap, and it doesn't fan out to multiple devices or subscribers on its own. For anything beyond a single, session-scoped connection, a provider that plugs into ChatTransport remains the more direct route.
When should I use SSE vs a channel-based transport for AI streaming?
SSE works for a single-device chatbot that streams one response per prompt with no need for the user to send anything back during generation. Once you need mid-stream cancellation, tool-call approval, or multi-device delivery, a managed WebSocket provider becomes the more direct fit, because it gives the client a return path SSE doesn't have.
What does SSE not support that WebSockets would solve for AI streaming?
SSE has no channel for the client to send data back over the same connection. WebSockets are bidirectional from the start, so cancellation, tool approvals, and steering signals travel as explicit messages rather than requiring a separate HTTP endpoint and custom coordination logic.
How do I replace SSE with WebSockets in Vercel AI SDK?
Implement the ChatTransport interface, which requires a sendMessages method that returns a stream of response chunks and a reconnectToStream method for resuming an in-progress stream. A WebSocket-based transport typically opens or reuses a channel per session, publishes the message, and returns a stream that yields chunks as they arrive on that channel.
Do raw WebSockets solve AI chat's requirements without a provider?
Not fully. A raw WebSocket gives you a return channel, but reconnection, multi-device delivery, and protocol fallback are still yours to build. Most production AI chat products use a managed WebSocket provider instead, which handles all three.
Recommended Articles

MQTT: The complete guide
MQTT is a pub/sub network protocol especially built to enable efficient communication to and from Internet of Things (IoT) devices.

Realtime apps with React Native and WebSockets: client-side challenges
Learn about the many challenges of implementing a dependable client-side WebSocket solution for React Native.

Pusher vs WebSockets: Pros, cons and key differences
Discover how Pusher and WebSockets compare, including their pros and cons, use cases, key differences, and the available alternatives.

